首页> 外文OA文献 >Modality and Morphology: What We Write May Not Be What We Say
【2h】

Modality and Morphology: What We Write May Not Be What We Say

机译:形态和形态:我们写的可能不是我们所说的

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Written language is an evolutionarily recent human invention; consequently, its neural substrates cannot be determined by the genetic code. How, then, does the brain incorporate skills of this type? One possibility is that written language is dependent on evolutionarily older skills, such as spoken language; another is that dedicated substrates develop with expertise. If written language does depend on spoken language, then acquired deficits of spoken and written language should necessarily co-occur. Alternatively, if at least some substrates are dedicated to written language, such deficits may doubly dissociate. We report on 5 individuals with aphasia, documenting a double dissociation in which the production of affixes (e.g., the -ing in jumping) is disrupted in writing but not speaking or vice versa. The findings reveal that written- and spoken-language systems are considerably independent from the standpoint of morpho-orthographic operations. Understanding this independence of the orthographic system in adults has implications for the education and rehabilitation of people with written-language deficits.
机译:书面语言是人类最近进化的发明。因此,其神经底物不能由遗传密码确定。那么,大脑如何整合这种技能呢?一种可能性是书面语言取决于进化上较老的技能,例如口头语言。另一个是专用基材的开发具有专业知识。如果书面语言确实取决于口语,那么必然会出现口语和书面语言的后天缺陷。替代地,如果至少一些底物专用于书面语言,则这种缺陷可能会双重消除。我们报告了5位失语症患者,记录了双重解离现象,其中词缀的产生(例如,跳跃中的-ing)在书写中受到干扰,但没有说话,反之亦然。研究结果表明,书面语言和口头语言系统从词法正交运算的观点来看是非常独立的。理解成年人的正字法系统的这种独立性对有文字缺陷的人的教育和康复有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号